W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

RE: CSS WG request to I18N WG about Unicode Normalization in CSS 3 Namespaces

From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 07:41:07 -0700
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <131F80DEA635F044946897AFDA9AC3476A92B722EE@EX-SEA31-D.ant.amazon.com>
Hi Daniel,

I have added it to our agenda for our next teleconference (in about 20 minutes from now).



Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Glazman
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 5:57 AM
> To: Leif Halvard Silli
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: CSS WG request to I18N WG about Unicode Normalization in CSS 3
> Namespaces
> Leif,
> We're still at odds about this issue, and it blocks moving CSS 3 Namespaces to
> the next stage along the REC track.
> Could the I18N Working Group, and that's an official request from the CSS WG
> here, please tell us exactly what we should add to the spec wrt Unicode
> normalization? I respectfully suggest you write the prose for us, given the
> complexity of the issue. Of course, your answer will go through our WG and in
> particular browser implementors, since this has potential huge impacts on
> performance.
> It seems to me the best summary of open options was a message by David
> Baron [1].
> [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/20090206225832.GA868@pickering.dbaron.org

> Thanks.
> </Daniel>
> --
> W3C CSS WG, Co-chairman

Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 14:45:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC