W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-speech] Editorial Comments Part II

From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:56:20 +0100
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <443BC91D-AC81-44F2-A62C-2E1EE7702440@gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

On 2 May 2011, at 19:05, fantasai wrote:
> 1. For manageability (especially when testing), spec should be  
> broken down into
>   more subsections than it is currently. Except where pairs of  
> properties are
>   defined together (e.g. 'cue-before' + 'cue-after' share a  
> definition), each
>   property should get its own subsection.

Thanks for the advice, I'll implement those changes soon (fragment  
identifiers / named anchors won't change, so it won't be a disruptive  
update with regards to existing references).

> 2. It would be good for each feature that corresponds to an SSML  
> feature to
>   link to the appropriate section of the SSML spec, perhaps in a  
> note, so that
>   it's well understood how CSS3 Speech and SSML correspond. This  
> should also
>   help reviewers catch any mismatches. :)

So I wouldn't be violating any "good practice" by adding direct links  
to SSML sections? Great! :)

Cheers, Daniel
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 18:56:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:40 GMT