- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 10:04:49 -0700
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > On 4/28/11 8:05 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> >> On 4/28/11 10:07 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote: >>> >>> Are CSS pixel ratio issues taken into account here? >> >> I'm not quite sure what you're asking here... >> > Is the content regenerated, if it can be, such as the case of an element > rendered by scene graph and using a purely vector based model (such as > online text with a ttf font) or is it a projection of the bitmap backing > store which the render tree of the element generated. > > That is: when a span with a font size of 12px is used, in a scaled manner > (transform), is it regenerated at a higher resolution, or is a low > resolution intended, with likely artifacts from scaling. > > > Is there an intention here to reflow and regenerate underlying bitmap data, > or is the reference simply a call to redisplay an existing > bitmap/rendering?(in reference to moz-element). That's an implementation detail. Ideally, vector-based graphics would scaled properly, but it may be easier in at least some cases to just reuse the bitmap underneath the element. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 17:05:36 UTC