W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [CSS21] Objection over Issue 203 (clearance and hypothetical position) (Was: Re: [CSS21] Clearance - the missing manual)

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:11:26 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vswb1bf8bunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:37:20 +0100, fantasai  
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> While we're in this section, Arron and I noticed that the first paragraph
> of the first clearance example is self contradicting (B2 has no children,
> but is not empty?)

Doesn't sound like a contradiction to me. CSS talks about the document  
tree as a tree of elements, and a child of an element is an element.

http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#doctree

<p style="clear:both">So, as I understand it, this could be B2.</p>

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 11:12:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT