- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:27:04 +0200
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 22/3/11 19:57, Rik Cabanier wrote: > A conic radial gradient also resembles a cone. Yes, but those are not supported by the standard radial gradient syntax (unless I misunderstood what you're referring to) so I don't see how it can be a source of confusion. > If we call them angle gradients, there is less chance of confusion. From my small experience with that, most people think of linear gradients with an angle when they hear the term "angle gradient", not of conical gradients. -- Lea Verou (http://leaverou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 13:27:41 UTC