W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

RE: [CSS 2.1][Section 9.5.2] Clearance and margin-collapsing: editorial clarifications suggested

From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:32:21 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@gtalbot.org" <www-style@gtalbot.org>
CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C340671BECD4364E8F9EBA27E8E231322DF90F68@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
The CSSWG resolved not to make these changes to the CSS 2.1 specification[1], but have deferred to the next revision. 

Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution.

[1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 1:20 PM
> To: www-style@gtalbot.org
> Cc: www-style@w3.org list
> Subject: Re: [CSS 2.1][Section 9.5.2] Clearance and margin-collapsing:
> editorial clarifications suggested
> 
> On 12/05/2010 12:07 AM, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I read a lot (but not all, there is a lot to read) of the thread
> > (august
> > 2010) with subject line "[css2.1] Issue 158 and Issue 178 Resolution"
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0078.html
> >
> > I see 2 sources of confusion or 2 misunderstandings created by the
> > formulation, textual presentation of section 9.5.2, including the
> > revised one [1]
> 
> These are both very good suggestions, and thankfully, not too complicated. :)
> 
> Filed as CSS2.1 Issue 249
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/0120.html
> 
> ~fantasai
> 
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 17:32:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT