W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

RE: [CSS21] @page selector grammar

From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:44:38 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C340671BECD4364E8F9EBA27E8E231322DF8CFB8@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. 

We hope this closes your issue.

Please respond before 14 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution.

[1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of fantasai
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:13 PM
> To: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: [CSS21] @page selector grammar
> 
> I was reviewing the page-grammar-001 test, and noticed that there's no
> normative grammar for the @page rule. The test refers to Appendix G, and
> asserts that white space between @page and a selector is optional; however
> this is nowhere stated in the spec.
> 
> Proposed to add after
> 
>    # An @page rule consists of the keyword "@page", followed by an optional
>    # page selector, followed by a block containing declarations and at-rules.
> 
> the following:
> 
>    | Comments and white space are allowed, but optional, between the
> @page
>    | token and the page selector and between the page selector and the
> block.
> 
> ~fantasai
> 
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 15:45:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT