W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: guidance on vendor prefixes (was Re: cursor: zoom-in and zoom-out)

From: irfan mir <theirf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:35:17 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimbFyh2a--P26eyh4rFUq+gQw3Sc8=-BcPEtg_q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
In other words, does the latest build of Opera support zoom-in and zoom-out
as they are— without vendor specifics?
On Mar 12, 2011 6:34 AM, "Philip Jägenstedt" <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:00:14 +0100, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:30, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
>> wrote:
>>> On 03/01/2011 03:15 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is very little "official" guidance on vendor prefixes - you're
>>>> not
>>>> alone.
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-2010/#experimental
>>
>> Thanks for that - good to have a reference for "experimental
>> implementations" in addition to "vendor specific extensions".
>>
>> Updated/expanded:
>>
>> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes
>
> Thanks Tantek,
>
> After reading through
> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes#cursor-zoom-in-zoom-out> and
> discussing this internally I've gone ahead and removed the -o- prefix from

> the zoom-in and zoom-out values. I'm not sure yet when this will be
> released in the wild, but it's safe to say that the prefixed versions will

> be short-lived enough to not matter.
>
> It's my strictly personal opinion that it would be good to consider
> prefixing more on a case-by-case basis. There must be many more features
> which are in practice stable but are still prefixed just because of the
> uncertainty around the situation.
>
> --
> Philip Jägenstedt
> Core Developer
> Opera Software
>
Received on Saturday, 12 March 2011 15:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT