- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:19:47 +0000
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug (oyvinds@opera.com) <oyvinds@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Øyvind, The CSSWG resolved not to make these changes to the CSS 2.1 specification [1]. We will be reevaluating this issue for errata and future versions of CSS. Please respond before 14 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution. [1] http://w3.org/TR/CSS Original message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0058.html ISSUE-273: http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-273 From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:26:04 +0200 To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org> Message-ID: <op.u1jg5qxgru61ud@oyvinds-desktop> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:59:33 +0200, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > On Monday 05 October 2009, L. David Baron wrote: >> On Monday 2009-10-05 18:34 +0200, Anton Prowse wrote: >> > # Any content in the current line before a floated box is >> > reflowed in >> > # the first available line on the other side of the >> > float. > The context is as follows. Imagine a line of text, where ### is an > image: > > One two three ### four five six. > > Now float that image to the left: > > #### One two three four five six. > > and note that the words "One two three" have moved to the *other side* > of the image! > > Yes, that is not very precise language. It talks about moving, but > nothing moves in CSS and the text never was at the left side to begin > with. It's also incorrect for right-floated boxes in LTR or left-floated boxes in RTL (assuming that "the other side" is interpreted as above). -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 18:20:20 UTC