W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Possible text-shadow enhancements

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 15:46:56 -0800
Message-Id: <95E89BE6-2C81-49E1-B1ED-70DE8DA8B8A2@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
To: Jordan OSETE <jordan.osete@gmail.com>

On Mar 4, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Jordan OSETE <jordan.osete@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, I ran into a little spec-related issue: as text-shadow allows
> multiple shadows (unlike box shadow), should we allow a different
> inset status for each shadow ? And if we do, how do we handle cases
> where inset and normal shadows are stacked one above another ? Should
> we "force" all inset shadows to be defined before normal ones, and
> throw a syntax error else ?

Box-shadow also allows multiple shadows. Insets are all above the background and others are all below the background, even if they are interleaved in the value list. 
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 23:47:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:44 UTC