W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [css3-background] Default shadow color

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:26:07 -0800
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <ACE0E92E-157A-44F4-97E0-8224D664D7F6@me.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On Mar 4, 2011, at 2:23 PM, fantasai wrote:

> On 03/04/2011 02:11 PM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Brian Manthos wrote:
>> 
>>>> How do you interpolate from inset to non-inset (and the reverse)?
>>>> 
>>>> from {
>>>> 	box-shadow: 0 0 0 blue;
>>>> }
>>>> to {
>>>> 	box-shadow: 0 0 0 red inset;
>>>> }
>>> 
>>> Adjusting the example:
>>> from {
>>> 	box-shadow: 0 0 127px rgb(0,0,254);
>>> }
>>> to {
>>> 	box-shadow: 0 0 127px rgb(254,0,0) inset;
>>> }
>> 
>> I was just thinking about this recently when fixing a WebKit bug.
>> 
>> I think animating from inset to non-inset shadows automatically is too magical,
>> especially when both have different spreads. I think we should state that you
>> cannot transition between shadows of different types.
>> 
>> Of course, animating from no shadow to either type of shadow should work.
> 
> You could animate the offsets and spreads to zero and then transition from
> zero to the other shadow type. Theoretically. :)

That's exactly what I meant by "too magical" :)

Simon
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 22:27:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT