W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

RE: [CSS21] WG process - next steps for CSS21?

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 19:24:13 +0000
To: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2AB87D07@TK5EX14MBXC113.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
[Peter Linss:] 
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:56 PM, Peter Moulder wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:48:49AM +0000, Linss, Peter wrote:
> >> CSS 2.1 has been in the pipeline for far too long, many other specs
> >> normatively depend on it and it needs to be a REC to unblock progress
> >> in other areas.
> >
> > What other specs are those, and what bits of CSS2.1 do they depend on?
> 
> How about every other CSS module? EPUB? There are many others, listing
> them isn't the point, there are dependencies, period. We need to move  2.1
> forward and stop futzing with it. It'll never be perfect, that's what
> errata are for.

Quick example: CSS3 Selectors remains PR until CSS2.1 reaches REC. CSS3 
Backgrounds & Borders is another well-known module that could find itself 
in the same situation.
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 19:24:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT