W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] anonymous flexbox children

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:39:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6EC728.2040403@mit.edu>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/2/11 4:52 PM, Anton Prowse wrote:
> Indeed, but I guess it's precisely the "testing" angle that's
> interesting; the (largely philosophical) question is whether the failure
> of an implementation to implement /untestable/ requirements has a
> bearing on whether it is regarded as compliant. Common sense would
> dictate that it doesn't, of course, but...

Untestable requirements really make no sense... since you couldn't tell 
whether an implementation is fulfilling them or not!

Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 22:40:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:44 UTC