W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] anonymous flexbox children

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:33:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6EB792.4020402@mit.edu>
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 3/2/11 4:25 PM, Anton Prowse wrote:
> I've always been rather fascinated by this idea. Can an implementation
> claim to be compliant if it produces the same rendering in all cases as
> if it did implement these "invisible" abstractions, even if it actually
> doesn't implement them?

Yes, of course.  Compliance testing is black-box, no?

The "in all cases" part is the tough part.  ;)

Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 21:33:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:44 UTC