W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2011

Re: css3-fonts: inconsistent function name ornament() vs ornaments()

From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Cc: W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1171053147.284673.1308630552802.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.shared.sjc1.mozilla.com>


Hi Glenn,

Thanks for reviewing the CSS3 Fonts spec.

> In section 6.8 of [1], the syntax of font-variant-alternates
> specifies ornament(...) while the prose that follows uses
> ornaments(...). 

Fixed.

John Daggett

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 04:29:50 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: John Daggett: "Re: css3-fonts: <integer>, <length>, <number>, <percentage>, <string> used but not defined"
Previous message: Robert O'Callahan: "Re: css3-fonts: should not dictate usage policy with respect to origin"
In reply to: Glenn Adams: "css3-fonts: inconsistent function name ornament() vs ornaments()"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT