I'm confused, Simon. (a) You originally said: >>> linear-gradient(left, black, white) > > It comes as the first parameter, so logically associates with the > start of the gradient. Similarly, in the declaration it comes next > to the first color stop, so mentally will be associated with that stop. To which I said: > linear-gradient(0deg, black, white); > > Does it also hurt your brain that black is not used at the 0deg side > of the coordinate system? (b) And now fantasai says: > I'm taking an angle as a direction to move in, not as a > start point. To which you replied: > Agreed. I don't get the same cognitive dissonance with the angle > variant. So which is it? Do you think of it as a start position or a direction to move in? If the former (a), then my follow-up case should have the same cognitive dissonance. If the latter (b), then it's a totally different thing to which I again think you're both wrong but for a different reason. Treating that parameter as "a direction to move in" that means "left to right" but associated such a single markup string "left" seems utterly bizarre to me.Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 06:05:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT