W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] getting multiline flexbox back into the spec

From: Andrew Fedoniouk <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:03:47 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU165-ds90EB043D71555EF8FCD80F8600@phx.gbl>
To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, <www-style@w3.org>
>From: fantasai Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 7:32 PM To: www-style@w3.org 
>Subject: Re: [css3-flexbox] getting multiline flexbox back into the spec
>On 06/04/2011 01:40 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
>> ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> ± Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:01 PM
>> ±
>
>Option 6:
>
>   flex-orientation: rows | columns | horizontal | vertical
>
>   flex-wrap: no-wrap | wrap | balance*
>
>   flex-direction: [ forward | backward ] || reverse-stack
>
>* taken from howcome's balance-lines suggestion, to show how it would be 
>added
>   if we decide to add it for flexbox
>

? What exactly will be rendered in this case:

.flex-container {
  flex-orientation: rows;
  flex-wrap: no-wrap; /* wrapping what actually? */
  direction: rtl;
  flex-direction: backward;
}
.flex-container > * { width:50%; }

with this markup:

<div .flex-container>
   <p>1</p>
   <p>2</p>
   <p>3</p>
   <p>4</p>
</div>

-- 
Andrew Fedoniouk

http://terrainformatica.com 
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 06:04:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT