Re: [CSS OM] list of issues

Le 01/06/11 08:37, Sylvain Galineau a écrit :

> If we do read it with a strict eye then only ::before and ::after are
> supported [1]...so I'd very much argue against reading this normatively
> at this point :)

[1] is only an editor's draft. The current REC says nothing but 'pseudo-
element'. And that's what should be implemented at this time.

</Daniel>