Levantovsky, Vladimir: > Yet, the overwhelming majority of people have agreed there _are_ many good reasons to have this requirement. Should their opinions also be considered? Sure, and they should be rejected – actually redirected, since many of these reasons are quite valid (others less so), but they (and the requirement itself) should rather be moved to a more suitable, possibly yet to be drafted specification, e.g. “Web Fonts”. Leave both WOFF and CSS alone, they are simply not the right place.Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 11:41:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:42 GMT