W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-images] Reintroduce object-fit: none

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:35:00 -0800
Message-ID: <4D41F314.7040207@inkedblade.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, "Simon Pieters (zcorpan)" <simonp@opera.com>
On 01/27/2011 09:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Ok, so I'm hearing some good justifications for both 'cover' and
> 'none' (and I think 'scale-down' has similar nice justifications).

I'm still unsure about 'none'. The use case Leif has given is
panning the image, and in that case you'd probably want more than
just the ability to pan at 100% zoom level. If that's the use case
we're addressing, we should add percentages or something.

> I'm also hearing support from Safari and Opera about making replaced
> elements *always* hide their overflow.
>
> Is that acceptable to you, dbaron?

I agree that the contents of replaced elements should always be
clipped to the content edge. (I thought I'd made those changes
already. Must've been to css3-background.)

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 22:35:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:36 GMT