W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: [css3-images] 'image-fit/position' alias for 'object-fit/position' not needed

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:14:13 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinDe-4wSRFUiypcqyksw908K6ei--tjB0tcEuGE@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:47 AM, Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com> wrote:
> The 'object-fit' and 'object-position' properties ask:
>
> # Do we need to allow browsers to alias ‘image-position’
> # and ‘image-fit’ (the old names for these properties)
> # to these properties? Does any browser actually need
> # to do so?
>
> I believe only Opera has implemented these, and they were released with the
> 'object-' names from the beginning. Besides, they were prefixed, so I don't
> think it would matter anyway.

Removed, thanks for the clarification!

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:15:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:36 GMT