- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:55:10 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "tao.yu@nokia.com" <tao.yu@nokia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:00 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/19/2011 02:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 1/19/11 3:20 PM, tao.yu@nokia.com wrote: >>> background-clip: border-box; >> ... >>> IE8 behaves this way, but some other browsers >>> (Chrome/Safari/Opera v11) still paint both background-color and >>> background-image behind the dashed border. >> >> Doesn't Webkit still have a vendor prefix on background-clip? And >> isn't that expected, since CSS3 Backgrounds is not in CR yet? > > CSS3 Backgrounds did hit CR, and got pulled back to LC for some edits. > It has been stuck in procedural red tape since early November. But > since it did hit CR and none of the features were revoked for the LC, > dropping prefixes is valid. > > (W3C needs a CR errata process that doesn't invoke WD.) Yes, and Webkit did support many un-prefixed properties from b&b3, but in the latest nightlies that no longer seems to be the evident, at least in the case of border-image and a couple others.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 23:56:09 UTC