RE: Filter Templates

> From: public-fx-request@w3.org [mailto:public-fx-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Brad Kemper
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 10:22 AM
> To: www-style list; public-fx@w3.org
> Subject: Filter Templates
> 
> Let me begin by saying I know very little about SVG, but I am trying to slowly
> learn more.
> 
> There has been talk before about "canned" SVG filter effects. I would like to
> propose (or at least, discuss the merits of) accomplishing this via a templating
> element inside the filter element, that defines what values it takes from the
> CSS declaration.
> 
> Thus, for the following SVG filter that defines a certain drop shadow effect:
> 
> 	<filter id="bradsDropShadow" x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1"
> 			  filterUnits="userSpaceOnUse">
> 		  <feTemplate values="feFlood.flood-color && [feOffset.dx
> feOffset.dy feGaussianBlur.stdDeviation]"/>
> 		  <feFlood flood-color="black" in="SourceAlpha"
> result="Colorized" />
> 		  <feGaussianBlur stdDeviation="2" in="Colorized" />
> 		  <feOffset dx="2" dy="2" />
> 		  <feMerge>
> 			   <feMergeNode />
> 			   <feMergeNode in="SourceGraphic" />
> 		  </feMerge>
> 	</filter>
> 
> Given the above "feTemplate" values, it could be used in a declaration like
> this:
> 
> filter: url(#bradsDropShadow) 4px 5px;
> 
> ...and the two lengths would be mapped to the "dx" and "dy" of feOffset.dx,
> and the omitted values would take their default values from the regular filter
> values ("black" for flood-color and "2" for stdDeviation in the above example),
> as long as the order and so forth of the feTemplate values were satisfied.
> 
> Could that work?

Like Tab, +1 on concept. My first thought was to apply SVG Parameters to 
Filters. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-SVGParamPrimer-20090616/ for SVG
Parameters). 

Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 19:28:51 UTC