W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

RE: [css3] support for filters

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:26:50 -0800
To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>
CC: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>, "ed@opera.com" <ed@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8A13F0222395BD428969E5BA529EFA74776712EB7B@NAMBX01.corp.adobe.com>
Ø  You can already use any SVG filter in CSS.
Is this part of the CSS3 spec or are you referring to mozilla’s implementation?


Ø  That doesn't seem particularly difficult if you define transitions on CSS filter values to be pointwise transitions over the components of the filter expression.
I agree. It’s just something that needs to be spec’d out.

Rik

From: rocallahan@gmail.com [mailto:rocallahan@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert O'Callahan
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 5:10 AM
To: Rik Cabanier
Cc: Dean Jackson; Cameron McCormack; Charles Pritchard; ed@opera.com; www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3] support for filters

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com<mailto:cabanier@adobe.com>> wrote:
This would imply that you can use any svg filter in CSS which might be more work for the browser vender in the short term.

You can already use any SVG filter in CSS.
Also, it will make it harder to implement transitions and animations since the interpolation rules would need to apply to this new XML syntax as well.

That doesn't seem particularly difficult if you define transitions on CSS filter values to be pointwise transitions over the components of the filter expression.

Rob
--
"Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." [Acts 17:11]
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 01:27:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:35 GMT