- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:24:45 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Forwarding another message from Hixie: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> The *sole* problem is that Selectors uses the word "activate" in a >> different way than HTML does. (Specifically, we don't define what >> "activate" means, but HTML does, and it's a different meaning than what >> you want for :active.) > > I've changed the HTML spec to just say that "activate" means something > different just for the purposes of :active. It looks weird, but it means > that we can argue it's not conflicting, so hopefully that puts this issue > behind us. For reference, the relevant HTML spec text can be found at <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/links.html#selector-active>. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 20:25:38 UTC