W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [css3-images] Resolution (was: 4.3.2 Lengths (reference pixel?))

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:25:47 +0100
Message-Id: <AB60AA03-A766-49D0-A91A-7B07E51CB677@crissov.de>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper (2010-12-16 – cleaning up my drafts folder):
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote:
>> Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> In what contexts are "pixel size or similar in micrometers or millimeters" used to describe resolution?
>> 
>> Well, being the reciprocal it’s basically the same expressed differently. “254 DPI” <=> 0.1mm
> 
> I understand, but I thought you were saying that it is (or was) common to list it that way, without the "dots per", "pixels per", etc. So I am asking when and where resolution is listed that way. For printers, or what?

Dot pitch of monitors for example.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 20:26:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT