- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:10:12 -0500
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 14:35 +0100, Christoph Päper wrote: > John Daggett: > > > > Please keep in mind that CSS is *not* attempting to define a taxonomy of fonts, … > > Maybe it should. I've spent a little time thinking about tag-based font selection (as in Web tags, folksonomies, etc) and that fonts could even come with some tags in them. For sure CSS should not define such a taxonomy, because people don't agree on them, but a mechanism to share taxonomies (probably with a well-defined mapping to an RDF model) might work. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 14:11:17 UTC