W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

RE: [css3-text] Emphasis marks position in Traditional Chinese

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 04:24:18 -0500
To: Koan-Sin Tan <koansin.tan@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@w3.org>, pingooo <ping.nsr.yeh@gmail.com>, Ethan Chen <chief@ethantw.net>, Timothy Chien <timdream@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <A592E245B36A8949BDB0A302B375FB4E0AAF13A6DC@MAILR001.mail.lan>
Fixed the Editor's Draft[1]. Thank you all for the support to fix this issue.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-emphasis-position



Regards,
Koji

-----Original Message-----
From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Koji Ishii
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 12:35 PM
To: Koan-Sin Tan
Cc: www-style@w3.org; Ambrose LI; Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu; pingooo; Ethan Chen; Timothy Chien
Subject: RE: [css3-text] Emphasis marks position in Traditional Chinese

> > The problem is that, someone in Taiwan said it should be drawn above 
> > text at some point
> in the past, so we have conflicting opinions here, and neither of you and "the someone"
> have the proof yet. I'd like to make sure that people who believe so 
> are comfortable with what you think.
> >
> > It's way old, I can find it first appears in 1999 WD of CSS3 
> > Text[1]. I'm trying to reach
> people who worked on it, I'll bring back if I can figure out anything.
> >
> 
> If you found the guy, that would be good.

Got this. I've got contacted with them, and they agreed to all what discussed here. 

I'm glad that we have finally resolved the conflict, thanks for the great help you all have made so far. I'll fix the spec soon.


Regards,
Koji
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 09:23:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT