W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] anonymous flexbox children

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:19:27 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimqhh2Dw8p_vCFpiTY0p1-wTkwxuGNaqBa6jRPX@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
> The analogy with table is good in the way that nesting a valid table cell in a inline element creates an anonymous cell around the inline, and the nested cell is no longer part of this table. It does match my expectations for anonymous flex boxes.
>
> Can we add specific language to the flexbox spec (I don't mind starting with my version;) so that implementors can agree or disagree?

Certainly.  I'll draft up something today.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 21:30:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT