W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: [css3-speech] voice-volume "auto" value, relationship with 'visibility'

From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:24:33 +0000
Message-Id: <93ADA22B-FEC0-4E0F-9B76-169B7A29191E@gmail.com>
To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Errata and mea culpa: I inadvertently introduced a relationship with  
"visibility", here is the reply I sent to another email regarding this  
issue:

On 5 Feb 2011, at 18:20, fantasai wrote:
> I don't think 'visibility' should affect 'voice-volume'. It's  
> explicitly
> a visual control, and as has been mentioned before, while silence is
> analogous to invisibility, it's not a useful behavior in the aural
> dimension.

My bad, I injected this in my todo list following the group's  
conference call (having briefly talked about "visibility"), when in  
fact it wasn't destined to be part of the proposed specification, but  
merely just a potential area of further discussion. Fixed in the  
latest draft.

Regards, Dan


On 5 Feb 2011, at 12:23, Daniel Weck wrote:

> The recent introduction of the 'speakability' property clarifies the  
> implications of "display:none" in the aural dimension.
> Similarly, the new 'auto' value of the 'voice-volume' property  
> explicitly defines a relationship with the 'visibility' property  
> from the visual canvas.
>
> Please review the proposal [1], including the note at the very  
> bottom of the property description (about the analogy between  
> "'visibility' versus 'display'" and "'voice-volume' versus  
> 'speakability'").
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#voice-volume

Daniel Weck
daniel.weck@gmail.com
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 00:25:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT