W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [css3-background] - border-image-slice inconsistent should behave like edge shorthands

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:11:59 -0500
Message-ID: <4EF0191F.6050600@inkedblade.net>
To: Paul Duffin <pduffin@volantis.com>
CC: √ėyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 06/01/2010 07:18 AM, Paul Duffin wrote:
> My mistake, I read it too quickly and thought they all said "...is the same as the first."
>
> I think I have been spending too much time reading these specifications as I noticed that this phrasing was different from the phrasing used on the other properties and so assumed that it behaved differently too.
>
> Is there any particular reason why it does not use the same phrasing as the edge shorthands, which seems to be clearer (at least to me) than the current phrasing?

Nope. Fixed by using "left/bottom/right/top" instead of "fourth/third/second/first"
and tweaking sentences a bit to hopefully make it less awkward. :)

   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-slice
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-width
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-outset

for comparison
   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-width

Let me know if you have other suggestions for improvement.

~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 05:12:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:47 GMT