On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:47:51 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Right; I understood your meaning. My point was that, if >> 'display:none' prevents a transition from starting, then it *always* >> prevents a transition from starting. Having it as part of the start >> state should suppress everything, because the "is the element >> 'display:none' at this point?" check succeeds. > > > OK. I don't think that is obvious (that the check happens at the start > state), so I think the spec should be rather explicit about it. Yeah, thus my "if". ^_^ I agree it needs proper stating one way or the other. ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 16:22:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:47 GMT