W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:53:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDAEXdjXVhsk=CFuehq7DsDMB8Wmz_mC3ra4yBH-Jie_Og@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
> ± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> ± Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:06 PM
> ±
> ± Also, now it kinda looks odd that no-wrap is the only keyword that doesn't have a -reverse variant.
> ± Should we add one for consistency?
> ± I don't see much *use* for it, but if the lack would be confusing, we can fix it simply.
>
> It's a good observation but I agree that we'll be fine without no-wrap-reverse

Cool, I'll leave it out then.  Thanks, everyone!

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 20:54:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:47 GMT