Re: Design Patterns for at-rules

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@chromium.org> wrote:
> So I guess Category 1 and 2 are exempt, but I should add a guideline saying
> that Category 3 and 4 rules should specify how they interact with scoping,
> like cascading?

Yeah.

> Are there any @-rules that have a good representative text about how to
> specify the interaction with scoping?

Not yet!

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 00:34:40 UTC