W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-page] incorrect sentence in css 3 paged media

From: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:56:23 +1000
To: Luke Page <luke.a.page@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <20110824065623.GA29682@bowman.infotech.monash.edu.au>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:38:31AM +0100, Luke Page wrote:

> apologies if this should go somewhere more direct, but as per
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work#contribute

I notice that the above link says merely to post to www-style without
pointing to the "Status of this Document" section or mentioning the
"[css3-page]" etc. tags.

The "Status of this Document" section always gives the preferred place
where comments should be sent.  In the case of css3-page, www-style is
indeed the correct place to send comments, though it is preferred for
the Subject of the message to include the string "[css3-page]", which
I've added to the Subject for this reply.

Someone with write access to http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work
might consider changing that, so that review comments are less likely
to go unnoticed.

> I wanted to report in the CSS3 Paged Media specification
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-page/), the following incorrect line...
> 
> LEFTBOTTOM_SYM       ::= "@right-bottom"
> 
> It should be LEFTBOTTOM_SYM ::= "@left-bottom"

Thanks for sending this fix.

I notice that this has already been fixed in the Editors' Draft:

  http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#syntax-page-selector

(It's unfortunate that http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-page/ is still a 2006
version, and doesn't include a link to the Editors' Draft.)

pjrm.
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 06:56:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT