W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:09:58 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F017829332972@TK5EX14MBXC297.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
That works for me; something that would be helpful now that
we're on the LC-CR stretch would be a single place where all
outstanding issues are tracked. Wiki, Tracker, bugzilla: doesn't 
matter but we're getting to the stage where changes really map
to issues. Do we have that ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:38 PM
> To: Brian Manthos
> Cc: Sylvain Galineau; fantasai; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > So where do we sit on this topic?  Do we focus on moving the module
> forward to CR or find some way to move individual features to CR instead?
> 
> The point is that there's no need to distinguish.
> 
> We move the module to CR.  Prefixes drop when a feature is (a) in a CR
> draft, and (b) implemented such that the impl passes the test suite
> sufficiently (this is self-judged).
> 
> ~TJ

Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 22:10:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT