Andrew Fedoniouk: > +1 and yet ... > > Wearing one of my hats: art of management is just a talent > of creation systems of motivations for your subordinates. > (do not remember where I read this statement) > > I mean that if UAs were strict enough in this subject and show > "Invalid document" instead of making attempts of rendering it we > would live with better content. The world wasn't ready for that when HTML "woke up". It's arguably still having issues working with it for XML. > Or at least some sort of "shame on you" watermark, huh? Sure, that makes the website look "dumb" but how does that help the user get a reasonable and useful print result? > In the same way as browsers visualize broken certificate now. > Authors would be motivated to produce something reliable... > Too extreme? Much of the web still flags bad or expired certificates; shame hasn't been enough of a motivator. People often just complain about the messenger/informer ("Why are you asking me questions? Just render!") because web site authoring perfection isn't the user's priority much (most?) of the time.Received on Friday, 19 August 2011 05:19:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT