W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

RE : RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17

From: Francois REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:04:32 +0200
Message-ID: <897765.45480.qm@smtp107-mob.biz.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I don't know about the specifics but even if features can progress on their own, web authors will find it easier to have a recommendation document about a set of features rather than a document which change every week and that mix proposals, drafts and accepted properties. Just a thought.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Sylvain Galineau
Envoye le : jeudi 18 aout 2011 06:04
A : fantasai; www-style@w3.org
Objet : RE: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions Telecon 201-08-17


[fantasai:]
>    - RESOLVED: Put ltr | rtl keywords back into image(), mark as at-risk.
...
> <fantasai> Florian, prefixes are dropped per feature, not per module.

Don't know how I missed this; the last time I pointed out we agreed we could move 
to CR on a per-feature basis when possible you said we did not in fact agree to that,
though we discussed it. Can you point to the decision allowing us to do this? If that 
is the case then we never needed to move anything to Level 4 on the grounds of moving 
gradient standardization forward, did we ?
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 07:04:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT