W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-conditional] Where () are ok inside @supports?

From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:12:04 +1000
Message-ID: <4E425974.9050003@css-class.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, www-style@w3.org, Vitor Menezes <vmenezes@mozilla.com>
On 10/08/2011 12:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alan Gresley<alan@css-class.com>  wrote:

>> I never liked this form of nesting. It does not occur in CSS3 mediaqueries
>> nor any other syntax that has statements with blocks. I believe that several
>> arguments appearing between blocks are better separated by commas or
>> keywords, like shown below for the ease of commenting parts out but more so
>> to hunt down parsing errors.
>>
>>     @supports not (display:block and display:inline)
>>
>>     @supports not (display:block , display:inline)
>
> Neither of these work, as the property values may include commas or
> the keyword "and".


Can you please give me examples of these?

Off the top of my head, I can think of comma separated values for the 
properties 'background' and 'box-shadow'. Apart from mediaqueries, where 
is the keyword 'and' used?


> You absolutely must enclose the declarations in
> parens (or some other delimiter that cannot be mistaken for part of a
> value).
>
> ~TJ


OK, another possible delimiter.


     @supports (display:block) and ([display:inline])


     @supports not ([display:block] and [display:inline])


     @supports ([display:block])



-- 
Alan Gresley
http://css-3d.org/
http://css-class.com/
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 10:12:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT