W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [css3-images] Impl feedback requested - detached elements in element()

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:42:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4DBA1768.6000405@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On 4/28/11 9:20 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Hixie was recently tweaking the HTML side of this (you need a
> mechanism to refer to the detached elements, since Selectors can't
> target them), and was curious why I excluded other replaced elements
> like<iframe>.  I don't have a very good answer to this question, so I
> wanted to see what reasoning there was in Gecko to not allow other
> detached replaced elements to be used.

In Gecko, detached iframe's can't be rendered at all.  The data 
structures that compute style data and create a box tree are only 
allowed to exist when the iframe itself has a box.

> (The best I've got so far is that all the data necessary to display
> img/video/canvas is present automatically, as part of the elements'
> natures, so it's easy to present that data via element() even if the
> element's not in the DOM.


> However, an<iframe>  needs to actually do
> layout on its contents to be displayed; this *can* be done without a
> surrounding document.

In Gecko at the moment it cannot.

Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 01:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC