- From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:18:45 +0100
- To: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Editors's draft updated with 'speak' and 'speak-as': http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#speaking-props /Daniel >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> There are currently no implementations of 'speakability' [1], as >>> it has only just been created from the old [2] 'speak' property >>> (which is now split into 2 distinct properties). >>> >>> Existing implementations [3] of previous versions of the CSS3- >>> Speech draft will have to be updated anyway, so we might as well >>> grab the opportunity to fix the specification now. Given the >>> scarcity of both CSS-Speech/Aural implementations and content, I >>> would have thought that the "annoyance" caused by the renaming / >>> refactoring of the speaking properties would be minimal. Note that >>> the proposed change would not diverge much from the old CSS 2.1 >>> Aural Appendix [4] either: >>> >>> 'speak' ==> [auto | none | normal] >>> 'speak-style' ==> [ normal | spell-out | digits | literal- >>> punctuation | no-punctuation ] >>> >>> (PS: I am not keen on your suggested 'pronunciation' property >>> name, because of the risk of confusion with phonemes and >>> lexicons ... thus why I propose 'speak-style' instead) >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech/#speakability >>> >>> [2] >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-speech-20041216/#speaking-props >>> >>> [3] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0389.html >>> >>> [4] >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/aural.html#speaking-props
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 21:19:16 UTC