- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:11:40 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, then. I think the styles are valuable to support, given that > they are used in real life. Should we perhaps just limit the styles > to the range 0-9999? That would cut out a decent chunk of complexity > (as it would limit them to a single "group") and still support the > *vast* majority of use-cases. > > I'd have to review, but I think this would also allow me to define > several of them using the 'additive' type. A few would still have to > be explicitly defined (the Chinese ones, in particular, due to the > zero-collapsing rule they have), but it would be less than the current > set. Upon review, yes, I could do the Japanese and Korean styles as simple additive styles if I limited them to the range [0,9999] (or [-9999,9999]). Chinese would still have to be specially defined, but it would be significantly simpler if also limited to that range. This seems like an adequate compromise - 10k should be enough for anyone, right? ~TJ
Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 23:12:27 UTC