- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:37:44 +1000
- To: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>
- CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 23/04/2011 5:00 AM, Alexander Shpack wrote: >> I don't think he's suggesting that the specific-prefixes would stop working, just that there might usefully be an easy way to write "I want the frotz behavior, and it's fine by me if it's standard frotz, -webkit-frotz, -o-frotz, -super-frotz, -barely-frotz, -ms-frotz, or even -totallynew-frotz". >> > > Correct! > > In addition. > https://developer.mozilla.org/media/css/common-min.css > > -moz and -webkit prefixes was used more than 50 times each! > > I, as web-developer, will shot himself, when I develop any page with > border-radius, box-shadow or something similar. When was the last time that you tested to see if un-prefixed versions of those properties are supported? Many browsers support them now un-prefixed. At this moment of time WebKit supports border-radius without a prefix but has trouble with percentage values in some cases. -webkit-border-radius: 120px 120px; /* WebKit will use these values */ border-radius: 50% 50%; /* WebKit does not handle percentage values in some cases */ -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Saturday, 23 April 2011 07:38:12 UTC