- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:21:25 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:06 AM > > How do you feel about removing flexible padding, and instead speccing a > 'box-align' property, as was discussed a few years ago? Considering that 'box-align' is what I have implemented I would support it. However you previously insisted that older 'box-align' doesn't handle use case you cared about - stretching the boxes while aligning baseline of content. Are you now OK with going back completely to 'box-align:before|after|middle|baseline', with baseline defined as in 2007 spec, or will you want to revisit the align values? > > If flex() can take space separated flexibility and size, and flexibility > is one or two numbers, then the weird sequence is not allowed. > > Okay, I'll make the edit on Monday. This sounded good last Saturday, did you change your mind (in later mail)?
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 09:22:19 UTC