- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:48:58 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:15 PM > > Nah, using 'fr' (or 'fl', whatever) for absolute flex and > 'flex(<pref>,<pos-flex>,<neg-flex>)' for relative flex. > I think it is worth trying. It means 2fr == flex(2,0,0px) Right? And would this mean that you are then satisfied with how easy it is to apply absolute flex, so the default value for preferred size in flex() function can be *initial value*, and "width:flex(2)"=="width:flex(2,0,auto)" ? Alex
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 23:49:28 UTC