W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Unicode normalization in CSS

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:59:46 +0200
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110412035946681679.c3d64c60@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Leif Halvard Silli, Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:57:04 +0200:
> Leif Halvard Silli, Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:03:03 +0200:
>> Daniel Glazman, Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:23:14 +0200:
>>> Le 11/04/11 16:11, Leif Halvard Silli a écrit :
>> Fantasai said she was in lack of conclusion. Since she is a spec 
>> editor, I offer the conclusion that we could document the issues. And 
>> by, "issues", I mean summarize/list the affected letters. And also to 
>> describe *when* it is likely to be an issue, such as when linking to 
>> files - which for instance affect a:visited{}.
> There is a file at www.UNICODE.org which I believe lists the affected 
> characters. [1] Expressing the essence of that list, in light of CSS, 
> with some humanly readable words, would be a good start. (And perhaps 
> creating a tool by which the author can check if his/her letters are 
> affected.) 

> [1] http://unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/DerivedNormalizationProps.txt

I should have pointed to the Normalization Charts instead: 

"The Normalization Charts provide charts of the characters in Unicode 
that differ from at least one of their normalization forms (C, D, KC, 
leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 02:00:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC