W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: box tree terminology

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:04:54 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTik_7bzxVqACm6hdHNHDedvJkSz64L8_AXDnWbMc@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Alex Danilo wrote:
>>>  book:volume
>>>  box:?
>>
>> box: slice
>
> We already use that term for border-image. Also, it would seem a little weird to call an anonymous inline box a slice, IMO.

I dunno, it kinda works for me.  Second best thing I've heard so far
(behind "box layout thing").

~TJ
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 17:05:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:39 GMT