W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2011-03-30

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:25:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4D9553B4.40808@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style@w3.org
Le 01/04/11 02:27, Peter Moulder a écrit :

> Yes; sorry, the emphasis was supposed to be "Although that sounds bad
> when you first read it, the important thing is to consider how each of
> those listed concerns will be in two months' time".  I deliberately
> didn't give my own assessment, because it's uninformed, but I'd have
> thought that most of the concerns should be greatly reduced by that
> time, that two months is enough time to fix or work around most damage.

According to a few ex-colleagues of mine working in nuclear security,
probably not. The time needed to secure the whole plant is, according
to them, a matter of years, not months.

Anyway, this is www-style here and the discussion about the WG's ftf
is probably not best hosted here.

Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 04:25:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:44 UTC