W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: :invalid

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:57:41 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinsbLF571S=nAr26_K3Lf6DNKENA0_bQy_tSpy8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Ryan Seddon <seddon.ryan@gmail.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir.lamouri@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:58:55 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>
>> Definitely interested to hear opinions on what people think about
>> these solutions.
>
> Adding :invalid-ui makes the most sense to me. That allows :invalid to stay
> paired with :valid.

The question is, what would the use case for :invalid be then?

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 18:05:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT