W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-3d-transforms] Relationship of CSSMatrix interface definitions

From: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:25:41 -0700
Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <0C6FA670-EA2C-42A4-88C4-0A04827B77D5@apple.com>
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>

On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote:

>> From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On
>> Behalf Of Chris Marrin
> 
> 
>> That looks much more clear, to me at least. Is it legal to redefine the
>> translate, scale and rotate functions?
> 
> Legal in what sense ? It certainly makes sense to add the optional z parameter 
> to the 3D interface and it seems cumbersome to have two versions of each
> method.

I mean is it valid IDL. If so, then no problem.

-----
~Chris
cmarrin@apple.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 21:26:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT